Skip to content
Private preview — Design partners are now being selected for controlled agent-execution pilots.Apply now

AI CONTROL INFRASTRUCTURE

The AI kill switch is not a button. It is a control system.

Stopping one model endpoint does not stop an AI system. A complete shutdown capability requires inventory, independent authority, graduated intervention, cross-system propagation, operational continuity, evidence preservation, and verified recovery. Decision Hypervisor provides the control layer.

Model-independent · Vendor-neutral · SaaS, VPC, on-premises or air-gapped

Why endpoint shutdown is insufficient

AI systems are distributed across models, agents, tools, credentials, APIs, clouds, data stores, and physical systems. A complete control system must address every layer.

Model shutdown

Stop inference at model endpoints. Necessary but insufficient — agents may continue executing previously authorized actions.

Agent shutdown

Terminate autonomous software, revoke tool access, credentials, network connections, and queued actions across the agent fleet.

User and account suspension

Suspend specific users, accounts, or use patterns without affecting the entire platform.

Capability restriction

Disable individual tools, connectors, data access, or high-risk capabilities while maintaining core operations.

Inference and compute throttling

Reduce inference rates, token budgets, compute allocation, or concurrency to limit system capacity proportionally.

Environment isolation

Block external egress, revoke delegated authority, and prevent lateral movement across environments.

Control must exist outside the model

A model cannot be the final authority over whether it is monitored, restricted, suspended, or shut down. The control layer must be structurally independent of the reasoning system it governs.

Reasoning Plane

Models and agents. They propose, plan, reason, and request actions. They should not determine the boundaries of their own authority.

Control Plane

Decision Hypervisor. Independent credentials, separate administrative domain, out-of-band channels. Evaluates authority, applies policy, enforces intervention.

Execution Plane

Tools, infrastructure, data, and machinery. Every consequential action flows through the control plane before reaching this layer.

Shutdown propagation must be verified

An intervention that cannot be verified cannot be trusted. Every affected component must acknowledge enforcement. Unacknowledged components represent control gaps.

1

Authority validation

Order signed and authorized

2

Provider adapters

Instructions dispatched

3

Model endpoints

Throttled or stopped

4

Agent runtimes

Suspended or terminated

5

Tool gateways

Access revoked

6

Credentials

Invalidated

7

Network controls

Routes isolated

8

Verification probes

Independent confirmation

Stop dangerous behavior without stopping the enterprise

A blunt shutdown can create a second emergency. Control architecture must include continuity — transitioning critical operations to an approved fallback before or during containment.

Earlier model version

Roll back to a known-safe model checkpoint.

Alternate provider

Route to a different model provider or service.

Rules engine

Deterministic logic that does not depend on AI inference.

Human workflow

Route decisions to trained human operators.

Read-only mode

Maintain visibility while preventing all mutations.

Queue and hold

Accept requests but defer execution until control is restored.

Geographic isolation

Restrict to specific regions or jurisdictions.

Safe-state controller

Transition physical systems to a known-safe operating state.

Evidence preservation and controlled recovery

Do not merely issue a shutdown order. Prove it was executed. Recovery must be governed as carefully as shutdown — an unauthorized reactivation can reintroduce the original risk.

Evidence package

  • • Original intervention order and authority
  • • Affected systems and model versions
  • • Active policies and context snapshot
  • • Commands issued and acknowledgements received
  • • Failed or delayed controls
  • • Credentials revoked and network changes
  • • Model-weight and telemetry preservation records
  • • Notifications issued
  • • Failover actions and continuity state
  • • Outcome verification and cryptographic hashes
  • • Complete event timeline

Recovery governance

  • • Root-cause confirmed and remediated
  • • Policy and model changes applied
  • • Evidence completeness verified
  • • Controlled test of intervention and failover
  • • Multi-party recovery authorization
  • • Staged reactivation with monitoring
  • • Enhanced observation period
  • • Formal incident closure

How Decision Hypervisor provides the control layer

Decision Hypervisor is the independent execution-control layer positioned between autonomous intelligence and consequential action.

Pre-execution interception

Every consequential action is evaluated before it reaches tools, APIs, databases, or infrastructure.

Graduated response

Six decision states from Authorized through Denied, with modification, escrow, human review, and routing.

Fail-closed enforcement

Unresolvable policies deny by default. The system does not fail open.

Cryptographic evidence

SHA-256 hash-chained, append-only decision traces provide tamper-evident forensic records.

Authority and delegation

Bounded authority grants, delegation chains, jurisdiction scoping, and time-limited execution tokens.

Deterministic replay

Any decision can be reconstructed exactly as it occurred for incident investigation and verification.

Frequently Asked Questions

Could you stop every consequential AI system today?

Identify control gaps before an incident, regulator, customer, insurer, or board member asks.

Intelligence proposes. Authority decides. Control remains human.

Request a Control Pilot